Hoopraker

-->

Towing the company line, the spin proffered through the Columbus media had surface appeal: Georgetown was just too good, too athletic and too big.  In the end, there was simply nothing Ohio State could’ve done to stop the Hoya juggernaut.  Here’s a novel theory: Ohio State was outcoached by John Thompson III.

Against Georgetown, and throughout the entire season, when confronted with a tough, disciplined defense, Ohio State struggled mightily to find a decent shot.  For the culprit of this recurrent difficulty, look no further than Thad Matta’s poorly designed half-court offense and its inane reliance on quick 22 foot shots.  Despite possessing its own 6′9″ beomouth in Big Ten Player of the Year Terrence Dials, Ohio State typically refused to look inside for offense.  Rather, the Buckeyes with incessent encouragement from the sidelines continued to jack three pointers, most of which missed their mark.

With the season now over for the Buckeyes, it’s evident that the reliance on sloppy three pointers made them too predictable and too one dimensional and too easy to manipulate.  As the jumpers turned to bricks, well-coached teams, even Northwestern, exposed Ohio State as an outfit confused in the half-court. Out of time outs, they opted for impatient long distance shots, which more often than not missed their mark. When confronted with solid defense, inept and empty possessions became the norm.

Despite the rationalizing undertaken by the friends of Ohio State posing as the Columbus media, don’t be persuaded by the  sugarcoating. Ohio State didn’t lose to so badly to Georgetown because they were outclassed by a more talented team. Ohio State lost to Georgetown because they were outmanuevered by a better coach.

As to Ohio State’s future, it isn’t as glaringly bright as everyone presumes even with the heralded recruiting class coming in next season. As long as Matta coaches offensive impatience, Ohio State will have a difficult time becoming a consistent contender year in year out.  While they certainly can win their share of games in the regular season, as the NCAA Tourney routinely demonstrates, if a team can’t execute an offense, if a team can’t get a good look when it needs a bucket, when it really needs a bucket, they’ll be pressed to win the big game.

4 Responses to “Buckeyes, Befuddled”

Hi,

Several teams in the Big Ten need better in the paint production. OSU and Wisconsin were two. Tucker cant do it all by himself when double and triple teamed in the paint. Coach Ryan needs to get a second in the paint player with much better defense down low as well. That was absent with 6-11 Butch typically playing out near the 3 point line and just coming in on some plays for rebounds. The same WI team will be back so they will have some experience. But the Big Ten needs some better defense/offense including the paint to make it to the sweet sixteen. It was also interesting to see the NCAA winners play some stingy defense-less coast to coast playing-kind of like Bennets scheme but now its “respectable”.

[…] Vulnerability To Teams That Control Tempo Ohio State’s 18-point loss to Georgetown in last year’s NCAA tournament is a persuasive illustration of how smart, disciplined, ball controlling, defensive minded teams are the worst nightmare of the three ball Montes. Denying shot happy teams easy looks and forcing them to run extended halfcourt offense is a highly recommended and effective strategy. Shot happy teams rarely have the patience and poise or the half court sets to solve good, tempo slowing defenses. Add a deliberate, ball controlling offense to the strategy and the pitch and shoot teams are even more vulnerable. In a game that has been slowed, each possession becomes even more valuable, more fraught. Long jumpshots have a tendency to tighten up in these scenarios. See analysis here. […]

[…] Interestingly, another lackluster performance against an inferior team was lost on Thad Matta who, after the game sarcastically dismissed the notion that his offense needs to run through Greg Oden or, at the least, get more touches for the once in a generation big man. In perhaps a sign of tension within Ohio State, Mike Conley “told the team, ‘If you’ve got to pass up open shots to get the ball to Greg, you’ve got to do it sometimes.’ I hope everyone takes that to heart.” Thus far, Conley’s approach is falling on deaf ears, including, apparently, his coach’s. As they have all season, Ohio State stands around on offense when confronted with a zone. Love it or hate it, the performance of the Ohio State and the shots they take correspond to Matta’s offensive philosophy and are no accident. Perhaps as the sarcastic Matta intoned, he’s winning pecks of games so everyone should back off. But as Hoopraker has observed for the past two seasons, not only is Matta’s perimeter offense counterintuitive, cumbersome and frustrating for a basketball fan to watch, it’s prone to implode when faced with a good defensive team as it surely will be in the NCAA Tourney. […]

[…] Bring Their A+ Game Columbus continues puts its head in the sand and attribute last year’s blowout NCAA loss to Georgetown as a physical mismatch. The loss to Georgetown was excused because the Hoyas were too big to be beaten by Ohio State. Contrary to this Franklin County conventional wisdom, last year’s loss was the product of the talented coaching of Thompson III, who assembled a disciplined basketball team that exposed Ohio State’s impatience on offense. While Thad Matta has refused to show his team game film of last year’s blowout, he surely has watched the film. It demonstrates the ability of structured offense and solid team defense to disrupt, frustrate and ultimately beat a collection of free wheeling sharpshooters. If Ohio State wants to win, it’ll need to have learned important lessons from last year’s loss. […]

Something to say?

BallHype: hype it up!